Volltextdatei(en) vorhanden
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.advisorVan den Bergh, Roger J. (Prof. dr.)
dc.contributor.advisorEger, T. (Prof. dr.)
dc.contributor.authorGospodinov, Penio Penev
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-19T12:59:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-19T12:59:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/handle/ediss/5978-
dc.description.abstractThis work provides several policy proposals capable to strengthen the private enforcement of EU competition law in arbitration. It focuses on the procedural law aspects that are permeated by legal uncertainty and that have not yet fallen under the scrutiny of the law and economics debate. The policy proposals described herein are based on the functional approach to law and economics and aim to promote a more qualified decision making process by: adjudicators, private parties and lawmakers. The resulting framework of procedural rules would be a cost-effective policy tool that could sustain the European Commission’s effort to guarantee a workable level of competition in the EU internal market. This project aims to answer the following broad research question: which procedural rules can improve the efficiency of antitrust arbitration by decreasing litigation costs for private parties on the one hand, and by increasing private parties’ compliance with competition law on the other hand? Throughout this research project, such broad question has been developed into research sub-questions revolving around several key legal issues. The chosen sub-research questions result from a vacuum in the European enforcement system that leaves several key legal issues in antitrust arbitration unresolved. The legal framework proposed in this research project could prevent such a blurry scenario from impairing the EU private enforcement of competition law in arbitration. Therefore, our attention was triggered by those legal issues whose proposed solutions lead to relevant uncertainties and that are most suitable for a law and economics analysis.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherStaats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectLaw and Economicsen
dc.subjectEconomic Analysis of Lawen
dc.subjectInternational Arbitrationen
dc.subjectCompetition Lawen
dc.subjectLegal Procedureen
dc.subject.ddc340 Recht
dc.titleThe Application of European Competition Law in Arbitration Proceedingsen
dc.title.alternativeDie Anwendung des europäischen Wettbewerbsrechts in Schiedsgerichtsverfahrende
dc.typedoctoralThesis
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-12-15
dc.rights.ccNo license
dc.rights.rshttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.bcl86.03 Rechtstheorie, Rechtsmethodik, Allgemeine Rechtslehre
dc.subject.bcl86.06 Rechtsvergleichung, Rechtsvereinheitlichung
dc.subject.bcl86.17 Freiwillige Gerichtsbarkeit, Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit
dc.subject.bcl86.29 Wettbewerbsrecht, Kartellrecht
dc.subject.bcl86.30 Internationales Privatrecht
dc.type.casraiDissertation-
dc.type.dinidoctoralThesis-
dc.type.driverdoctoralThesis-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.thesisdoctoralThesis
tuhh.opus.id8198
tuhh.opus.datecreation2017-01-24
tuhh.type.opusDissertation-
thesis.grantor.departmentEuropean Doctorate in Law & Economics (EDLE)
thesis.grantor.placeHamburg
thesis.grantor.universityOrInstitutionUniversität Hamburg
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.gvk.ppn878941754
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:18-81988
item.advisorGNDVan den Bergh, Roger J. (Prof. dr.)-
item.advisorGNDEger, T. (Prof. dr.)-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.creatorOrcidGospodinov, Penio Penev-
item.creatorGNDGospodinov, Penio Penev-
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Elektronische Dissertationen und Habilitationen
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung Prüfsumme GrößeFormat  
Dissertation.pdfd00c08f751b397e8658f154d962c29031.99 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen
Zur Kurzanzeige

Diese Publikation steht in elektronischer Form im Internet bereit und kann gelesen werden. Über den freien Zugang hinaus wurden durch die Urheberin / den Urheber keine weiteren Rechte eingeräumt. Nutzungshandlungen (wie zum Beispiel der Download, das Bearbeiten, das Weiterverbreiten) sind daher nur im Rahmen der gesetzlichen Erlaubnisse des Urheberrechtsgesetzes (UrhG) erlaubt. Dies gilt für die Publikation sowie für ihre einzelnen Bestandteile, soweit nichts Anderes ausgewiesen ist.

Info

Seitenansichten

304
Letzte Woche
Letzten Monat
geprüft am 23.04.2024

Download(s)

611
Letzte Woche
Letzten Monat
geprüft am 23.04.2024
Werkzeuge

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe